gordon.coale
 
Home
 


Weblog Archives

   
 
  Thursday  January 3  2002    01: 16 AM

Corporatism

This is another tale of environmental disaster and corporate greed. Maybe greed isn't the right word for what happened here. The article chronicles another community being devastated. But it also tells the story of an organism, a corporation, who's only thought is for it's own survival. An organism that is responsible to it's shareholders but not to the people it's killing. Maybe cancer is the right word.

Monsanto Hid Decades Of Pollution
PCBs Drenched Ala. Town, But No One Was Ever Told

On the west side of Anniston, the poor side of Anniston, the people ate dirt. They called it "Alabama clay" and cooked it for extra flavor. They also grew berries in their gardens, raised hogs in their back yards, caught bass in the murky streams where their children swam and played and were baptized. They didn't know their dirt and yards and bass and kids -- along with the acrid air they breathed -- were all contaminated with chemicals. They didn't know they lived in one of the most polluted patches of America.

Now they know. They also know that for nearly 40 years, while producing the now-banned industrial coolants known as PCBs at a local factory, Monsanto Co. routinely discharged toxic waste into a west Anniston creek and dumped millions of pounds of PCBs into oozing open-pit landfills. And thousands of pages of Monsanto documents -- many emblazoned with warnings such as "CONFIDENTIAL: Read and Destroy" -- show that for decades, the corporate giant concealed what it did and what it knew.

In 1966, Monsanto managers discovered that fish submerged in that creek turned belly-up within 10 seconds, spurting blood and shedding skin as if dunked into boiling water. They told no one. In 1969, they found fish in another creek with 7,500 times the legal PCB levels. They decided "there is little object in going to expensive extremes in limiting discharges." In 1975, a company study found that PCBs caused tumors in rats. They ordered its conclusion changed from "slightly tumorigenic" to "does not appear to be carcinogenic."
[read more]

This PCB pollution happened years ago so the company says "We don't do this anymore." This was their mindset in 1969:

In September 1969, Monsanto appointed an Aroclors Ad Hoc Committee to address the controversies swirling around its PCB monopoly, which was worth $22 million a year in sales. According to minutes of the first meeting, the committee had only two formal objectives: "Permit continued sales and profits" and "Protect image of . . . the Corporation."

What should make me think anything has changed?

thanks to Red Rock Eater Digest